Futurism in public sports:Sustainable monetization scenarios

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Physical Education and Sport, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Islamic Azad University

2 . PhD student in Sport Management, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Isfahan (khorasgan). Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Economics, Ayatollah Boroujerdi University, Boroujerd, Iran

Abstract

All sport is directly related to dynamism and mental health and also has a significant role in the development of health literacy and leads to increased health at all ages. But despite much progress, it is still looking for a way to generate sustainable revenue. The present study aims to predict the future of professional sports in Iran, to discover the future of All sports and to develop sustainable income generation scenarios for 1414 (2035) and to present a strategy. Futurism with a scenario approach has been used due to the method of intuitive logic and to design the scenarios, the method of trend analysis and uncertainties and a six-stage integrated scenario model were used. The participants of the present study included 25 domestic and foreign stakeholders of Iranian All sports who were selected based on purposive sampling.Data were collected through interviews and open-ended questionnaires.Based on the findings, the analysis of the 30 main factors obtained eventually led to the production of two key uncertainties that formed the basis of the four main scenarios of sustainable monetization of Iranian All sports.

Keywords


  • Adamson, M.M., Aftab, K., Madrigal, E.P., Timmerman, M.A., Chung, J., Galhotra, P.P., & et all. (2022). Rehabilitation Strategies and Innovations in Later Life for Traumatic Brain Injury. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology, Ready to publish. Doi:1016/B978-0-12-818697-8.00019-4.
  • Aguilar, L,. Portell-Cortés, I., Costa-Miserachs, D., Torras-Garcia, M., Riubugent, E,. Almolda, B,. & Coll-Andreu, M. (2020). The benefits of voluntary physical exercise after traumatic brain injury on rat's object recognition memory: A comparison of different temporal schedules. Experimental Neurology, 326:113178. doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113178
  • Ahmad, S., & Rogers, J.H. (1995). Government budget deficits and trade deficits Are present value constraints satisfied in long-term data?. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36(2): 351-374.
  • Bentley, S., Haslam, C., Cruwys,T., Cao, Y., &Milic, J. (2022). Groups 4 Health in Later Life. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology, Ready to publish. Doi: 1016/B978-0-12-818697-8.00037-6
  • Blanchard, O. J., Chouraqui, J.-C., Hagemann, R., & Sartor, N. (1991).The sustainability of fiscal policy: New answers to an old question NBER Working Paper (R1547).
  • Bohn, H. (1995). The sustainarity of budget deficits in a stochastic economy. Journal of Money,credit and banking, 27(1): 257-271.
  • Bohn, H. (2007). Are stationarity and constraint restrictions really necessary for the intertemporal budget constraint?. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(7): 1837-1847.
  • Bohn, H. (2008). The sustainability of fiscal policy in the United States. Sustainability of public debt: 15-49.
  • Buiter, W. H. (1985). A guide to public sector debt and deficits. Economic policy, 1(1): 13-61.
  • Buiter, W.H. (1992). Government solvency, Ponzi finance and the edundancy and usefulness of public debt. Retrieved from.
  • Buiter, W.H. (1995). Measuring Fiscal Sustainability. NBER Working Paper, 8509, National Bureau of Economic Research, 
  • Buiter, W.H. (2003). Ten Commandments for a fiscal Rule in the E  (M) U. Oxford Review of economic policy, 19(1): 84-99.
  • Butler, J., MarteBergseng, A., Bohensky, E., Pedde, S., Aitkenhead, M. & Hamden, R. (2020).Adapting scenarios for climate adaptation: Practitioners’ perspectives on a popular planning method. Environmental Science & Policy, 104: 13-19.
  • Campos, P., Álvarez, A., Mesa, B., Oviedo, J.L., Ovando, P., &Caparrós, A. (2020). Total income and ecosystem service sustainability index: Accounting applications to holm oak dehesa case study in Andalusia-Spain. Land Use Policy, 97: 104692.
  • Chalip, L., & Fairley, S.H. (2020). Special Issue Call for Papers: Sport and Public Health. Sport Management Review, 23 (4): Page iv.
  • Cho, M. (2017). Toward “Sport for all”: Jang Gwon and Sport Promotion by the Korean YMCA in the Japanese Occupation Era. Sport History Review, 48(1): 91-105.
  • Colignatus, T. (2020). National accounts in the anthropocene: Hueting's environmental functions and environmentally sustainable national income: Translation and relevance for ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 43: 101094.
  • Frith, D., &Tapinos, E. (2020). Opening the ‘black box’ of scenario planning through realist
  • Gardner, W., & Lidz, C.W. (2006).Research Sponsorship, Financial Relationships, and the Process of Research in Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 1 (2): 11-18.
  • Hamilton, M. (2021).Future Directions in Digital Information:Envisioning Education 4.0—A scenario planning approach to predicting the future. Published by Elsevier Ltd, 267-283.
  • Jackman, P.C., Dargue, E.J., Johnston, J.P., &Hawkins, R.M. (2021). Flow in youth sport, physical activity, and physical education: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 53, 101852. Doi: 1016/j.psychsport.2020.101852.
  • Leachman, L., Bester, A., Rosas, G., & Lange, P. (2005). Multiconintegration and sustainability of fiscal practices. Economic. Inquiry, 43(2): 454-466.
  • McCreary, C., Miller-Perrin, C., & Trammell, J.P. (2018). Past Sports Participation, Self-Efficacy, Goal Orientation, and Academic Achievement Among College Students. PSI CHI JOURNAL OFPSYCHOLOGICALRESEARCH, 24(3): 194-208.
  • McCuea, R., McCormacka,A., McElnay, J., Alto, A., & Feeney, A.  (2019). The future and me: Imagining the future and the future self in adolescent decision making. Cognitive Development,  50: 142-156.
  • Michael, G.,Dionigi, R.A., Dionigi, C. (2018). From a Lucky Few to the Reluctant Many: Interrogating the Politics of Sport for All. Sport and Physical Activity across the Lifespan, 4: 67-89.
  • Oliver, J.J., & Parrett, E. (2017). Managing future uncertainty: Reevaluating the role of scenario planning. Business Horizons, 61(2): 339-352.
  • Schwenker, B., & Wulf, T. (2013). Scenario-based Strategic Planning- Developing Strategies in an Uncertain World. Roland Berger School of Strategy and Economics, Springer Gabler, eBook.
  • Stoian, A. (2010). Fiscal Vulnerability vs. Fiscal Sustainability:Theoretical Background. Financial and Monetary Stability in Emerging Countries, 541.
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119801
  • Thorstad, R., & Wolff, P. (2018). A big data analysis of the relationship between future thinking and decision-making. National Academy of Sciences, 115: 1740-1748.
  • Velionv, A. (2015). Assessing fiscal – policy sustainability: on the different States of the debt-to-GDP process. Finanz-Archiv: Zeitschrift fur das Gesamte Finazwesen, 71(4): 415.
  • Vella, A.S., Liddle, S.K., Vierimaa, M., & Evans, M.B. (2020). Group dynamics and mental health in organized youth sports. The Power of Groups in Youth Sport, 16: 277-301. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816336-8.00016-0
  • Wang, L. (2020). Health literacy and exercise-focused interventions on clinical measurements in Chinese diabetes patients: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Eclinical Medicine, 17: 100211. doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.004
  • Wang, M., QingZhang, D., Wen, J., & KeatTan, S. (2018). Assessing hydrological effects and performance of low impact development practices based on future scenarios modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179: 12-23.
  • Yao, P.L., Laurencelle, L., & Trudeau, F. (2020). Former athletes’ lifestyle and self-definition changes after retirement from sports. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 9: 376-383.
  • Yeung, , Müller, U., Carpendale, J.I. (2019). Developmental continuity between social-cognitive skills at age 2 and false belief understanding at age4. Cognitive Development, 1(50): 157-66.